•  

How to recognize PCOS: results of a web-based survey at IVF-worldwide.com (May 2013)

reproductive biomedicine online
Title:
How to recognize PCOS: results of a web-based survey at IVF-worldwide.com
Journal:
Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 26, Issue 5, May 2013, Pages 500–505
Author(s):
Ning N1, Balen A, Brezina PR, Leong M, Shoham Z, Wallach EE, Zhao Y.
Author(s) affiliation:
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
 

 

Short description:
Link to the journal
 

 

Abstract taken from PubMed

Abstract:
This retrospective evaluation of a web-based survey posted from 1 to 30 September 2010 was to determine which diagnostic tools physicians are currently utilizing to diagnose polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Responses from 262 IVF centres in 68 countries are included in the study. Providers used various diagnostic criteria to diagnose PCOS, including the Rotterdam criteria (82%), National Institutes of Health criteria (8%), Androgen Excess Society 2006 criteria (3%) and other classification systems (7%). Many providers utilized diagnostic tools not necessarily included in traditional classification systems: 58% of respondents evaluated LH/FSH ratio in addition to androgen concentrations to define patients with PCOS; physicians also commonly obtain measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone (22%) and impaired glucose tolerance (74%) in diagnosing PCOS. Many respondents (64%) felt that polycystic-appearing ovaries on ultrasound with anovulation and a normal serum prolactin should be adequate criteria to diagnose PCOS. In conclusion, while the majority of centres (82%) uses the Rotterdam criteria to diagnose PCOS, other criteria and diagnostic tools are commonly used in evaluating patients with suspected PCOS. This study highlights the need for continual re-evaluation of PCOS diagnostic criteria with an ultimate goal of developing a consensus definition for the disorder in the future.

Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Link to the paper on PubMed
Comment in:
 




IVF-Worldwide.com endeavors to ensure that the information in this article is accurate,reliable and up to date. However, the information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. IVF-Worldwide does not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy,content, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article.
IVF-Worldwide.com is not responsible for the content of other websites linked to or referenced from this website. The website does not endorse the information, content,presentation or accuracy of such other websites and does not make any warranty,express or implied, regarding them.