Results: Mechanical Infertility

The incidence of mechanical factor infertility ranges from 7 to 18%, with the variability mostly associated with geography and the developmental status of the country.. Investigation can be done using a variety of diagnostic tests and procedures and the objective of the survey bellow is to share information on diagnostic procedures used.

Number of units participating in the survey. Most of the data analyzed came for Europe.

In most of the cases the Hysterospalingogram is the diagnostic tool of choice.

Interesting to find that 50% of the participants would evaluate tubal patency even though they are aiming to proceed with IVF. That may include, for example, patients with severe male factor infertility.

Although diagnostic hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard for evaluating the uterine cavity, it interesting to note that there is no clear consensus among practicing physicians regarding the method of choice for uterine cavity evaluation. There is a clear split in preference of diagnostic technique. Perhaps the question was not specific enough and some of the respondents referred to initial and definitive diagnostic steps.

Interesting observation, but the question is perhaps not detailed enough to evaluate the conditions which are considered as an indication for surgical intervention. 

It seems that there is an agreement to have septum removal before getting into IVF. Interesting because this is not evidenced-based.

The answer here may depend of the cost, insurance coverage and availability of either IVF or microsurgery.

Even though saplingectomy is evidence-based 49% would prefer different modes of treatment

Most physicians will ignore a small endometrioma

It looks as if this is  a simple type of surgery that does not justify the use and cost of  robotic technology